<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dump the Sick? &#187; Headline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dumpthesick.com/category/headline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dumpthesick.com</link>
	<description>a Canadian sounds off for U.S. single-payer health care</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WellPoint Subsidiary Fights Maine Over Big Rate Hike (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/10/05/wellpoint-subsidiary-fights-maine-over-big-rate-hike-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/10/05/wellpoint-subsidiary-fights-maine-over-big-rate-hike-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 5 insurer - Wellpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/10/05/wellpoint-subsidiary-fights-maine-over-big-rate-hike-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the latest video on the big health insurers from Brave New Films, this time looking at Wellpoint's efforts to sue the government of Maine for not allowing them to significantly raise premium rates. 

Nothing seems to slow these health insurance companies down, give them pause, fear backlash, etc...

I guess it's because the corporations aren't people, just profit-seeking entities. But what about public relations as an engine of profit, as I learned in my (misguided) business school days?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/109153/thumbs/s-WELLPOINT-large.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
Nothing seems to slow these health insurance companies down, give them pause, fear backlash, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s because the corporations aren&#8217;t people, just profit-seeking entities.  But what about public relations as an engine of profit, as I learned in my (misguided) business school days?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Maine, a subsidiary of WellPoint, the nation&#8217;s largest insurer, wanted the state to approve an average rate hike of 18.5 percent on its policyholders. Maine rejected the increase and now the insurer is fighting for the hike in court.<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/05/wellpoint-subsidiary-figh_n_309529.html">Read the Article at HuffingtonPost</a></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=WellPoint+Subsidiary+Fights+Maine+Over+Big+Rate+Hike+%28VIDEO%29+http://4cd6t.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.dumpthesick.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=WellPoint+Subsidiary+Fights+Maine+Over+Big+Rate+Hike+%28VIDEO%29+http://4cd6t.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/10/05/wellpoint-subsidiary-fights-maine-over-big-rate-hike-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>209</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll Shows Public Wants Medicare for All</title>
		<link>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/30/poll-shows-public-wants-medicare-for-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/30/poll-shows-public-wants-medicare-for-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumpthesick.com/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Would you favor or oppose the government offering everyone a government-administered health insurance plan like Medicare that would compete with private health insurance plans?”

65% percent of respondents said yes. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/25/us/politics/25poll.html?_r=1">New York Times/CBS News survey</a> last week shows that the people in the U.S. do want guaranteed insurance for all, even if the poll didn&#8217;t ask specifically about single-payer.  It was an offer of a very strong public option.  While I don&#8217;t believe a public option would work and I believe that single-payer is the only viable long-term option, this poll is a great indication of the desire of people for something far more through than Obama/Baucus, etc&#8230; are offering.</p>
<p>Here is the question from the poll:</p>
<p>“Would you favor or oppose the government offering everyone a government-administered health insurance plan like Medicare that would compete with private health insurance plans?”</p>
<p>65% percent of respondents said yes.</p>
<p>here is <a href="http://blackagendareport.com/?q=content/poll-shows-public-wants-medicare-all">a full analysis of the poll</a> by Black Agenda Report executive editor Glen Ford.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Poll+Shows+Public+Wants+Medicare+for+All+http://dzb33.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.dumpthesick.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Poll+Shows+Public+Wants+Medicare+for+All+http://dzb33.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/30/poll-shows-public-wants-medicare-for-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg: Canadian Health Care, Even With Queues, Bests U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/22/bloomberg-canadian-health-care-even-with-queues-bests-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/22/bloomberg-canadian-health-care-even-with-queues-bests-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-payer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumpthesick.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Bloomberg article sets the record straight on U.S. VS Canadian health care. Despite rhetoric to the contrary, Canadian public healthcare is quite good by most indicators and better than the U.S. by pretty much all indicators.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="U.S. Health care bests U.S." href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a_zs1Y1FspIM" target="_self">Bloomberg&#8217;s </a><a title="U.S. Health care bests U.S." href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a_zs1Y1FspIM" target="_self">Pat Wechsler </a><a title="U.S. Health care bests U.S." href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a_zs1Y1FspIM" target="_self">writes</a> of how Canadian health care is not as scary as many of the  myths floating about suggest.  In fact, Canadian public healthcare is quite good by most indicators and better than the U.S. by pretty much all indicators.  It is a great overview of what the Canadian single-payer system has to offer in comparison to the U.S. private health insurance model:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. spent $7,290 on health care for each person in 2007, 87 percent more than Canada’s $3,895, according to the latest OECD data. The U.S. also devoted the highest percentage of gross domestic product to health care, 16 percent, OECD numbers show. Canada’s expenditure was 10.1 percent.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Canadians live two to three years longer than Americans and are as likely to survive heart attacks, childhood leukemia, and breast and cervical cancer, according to the OECD, the Paris- based coalition of 30 industrialized nations.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Deaths considered preventable through health care are less frequent in Canada than in the U.S., according to a January 2008 report in the journal Health Affairs. In the study by British researchers, Canada placed sixth among 19 countries surveyed, with 77 deaths for every 100,000 people. That compared with the last-place finish of the U.S., with 110 deaths.</p></blockquote>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Bloomberg%3A+Canadian+Health+Care%2C+Even+With+Queues%2C+Bests+U.S.+http://8zs93.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.dumpthesick.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Bloomberg%3A+Canadian+Health+Care%2C+Even+With+Queues%2C+Bests+U.S.+http://8zs93.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/22/bloomberg-canadian-health-care-even-with-queues-bests-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not compromise: Baucus entrenched with corporate healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/19/its-not-compromise-baucus-entrenched-with-corporate-healthcare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/19/its-not-compromise-baucus-entrenched-with-corporate-healthcare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies, lobbies & fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumpthesick.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not convinced that Baucus has simply been trying to find common ground with Republicans in a well-intentioned but wrong-headed attempt to compromise that has backfired. 
[Image: New York Times]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/PicAppPIS/JavaScript/PisV4.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/PicAppPIS/JavaScript/PisV4.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p>With Max Baucus&#8217; disastrous healthcare bill unveiled last week without even providing a weak public option, I agree with <a title="Baucus debacle" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mitchell-bard/baucus-debacle-shows-why_b_289304.html" target="_self">Mitchell Bard&#8217;s contention</a> that Democrats need to get a backbone and stop trying to woo Republicans.<script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/PicAppPIS/JavaScript/PisV4.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p>But I am not convinced that Baucus himself (and many other, though not all, Democrats) has simply been a part of this attempt to find common ground with Republicans in a wrong-headed attempt to compromise that has backfired.  Baucus never, ever showed signs of anything other than being a friend of corporate healthcare.  His <a title="Baucus Senate hearings" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/5/13/baucus_raucus_caucus_doctors_nurses_and" target="_blank">Senate hearings in May</a> didn&#8217;t include anyone backing single payer, and as <a title="Dreier on Baucus" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/15/is_max_baucus_the_new_phil_gramm/" target="_self">made clear by Peter Dreier</a>, two of his former chiefs of staff are now lobbyists for the healthcare industry, he has consistently been against the public option, and is well entrenched in the pockets of the health insurance industry.</p>
<p>With some individual exceptions, the Democratic party is very much a corporate party. It is not simply the good guy who tries to make peace with these over-the-top Republicans in an effort at bi-partisan law making.</p>
<p>And Baucus sits as one of the parties most strident corporate cheerleaders.    If there is some backbone in the Democrats, it won&#8217;t come from Baucus.  I am not feeling particularily hopeful, but let&#8217;s hope the Dems take Bard&#8217;s excellent advice: &#8220;Forget Baucus&#8217;s bill. Don&#8217;t give the Republicans another victory (one which represents a defeat for the American people). Pass meaningful health care reform, even if not a single Republican votes for it.&#8221;  <span style="display: none;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="display: none;"> </span></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=It%E2%80%99s+not+compromise%3A+Baucus+entrenched+with+corporate+healthcare+http://t94ik.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.dumpthesick.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=It%E2%80%99s+not+compromise%3A+Baucus+entrenched+with+corporate+healthcare+http://t94ik.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/19/its-not-compromise-baucus-entrenched-with-corporate-healthcare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-payer through individual states first?</title>
		<link>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/17/single-payer-through-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/17/single-payer-through-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saskatchewan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-payer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumpthesick.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as the province of Saskatchewan in Canada was the first to have Medicare before it spread nationally, some are suggesting that pushing in states with strong movements for single-payer is the most likely path of success.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as the province of Saskatchewan in Canada was the first to have Medicare before it spread nationally, some are suggesting that pushing in states with strong movements for single-payer is the most likely path of success. With a comprehensive national plan not even on the agenda at the moment, it&#8217;s hard to argue against the idea of focusing on supportive states first and going from there.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong><a title="single payer by state?" href="http://labornotes.org/node/2397" target="_blank">Can We Win Single Payer State by State?</a> by Deborah Burger, Labor Notes</strong><br />
When the dust settles on a final health care bill this fall, the tens of thousands of labor and community activists who have worked for years to pass single-payer reform (Medicare for all) may be able to point to one major milestone: an amendment that would assist individual states to enact single-payer health care. <a title="single payer by state" href="http://labornotes.org/node/2397" target="_blank">read more&#8230; </a></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Single-payer+through+individual+states+first%3F+http://h8987.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.dumpthesick.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Single-payer+through+individual+states+first%3F+http://h8987.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dumpthesick.com/2009/09/17/single-payer-through-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

